King_Kekaulike_HS

//Note: Please limit your school’s priorities to four. Please use learning from each day’s sessions to refine and clarify these priorities rather than adding additional priorities.// =**Team Members Attending:**= =**Priority #1: Vertical Alignment and Instructional Fidelity in Mathematics Department**= =**Priority #2: Ammendment of Tiered Intervention System**= =**Priority #3: Equitability of Grading Systems Across Curriculum to Increase Student Achievement**= =**Priority #4: School-Wide Class Schedule Evaluation**=
 * Implementation Action Plan 2010-11** **Responding to the Needs of All Learners**
 * **School Name:** || King Kekaulike High School ||
 * **VPES:** || Ron Fales ||
 * 1) Susan Scofield (Principal)
 * 2) Jennifer Wolski
 * 3) Ryan Mossman
 * 4) Deba Williams
 * 5) William Fisher
 * 6) Jessica Lee
 * 7) Lorinda Deliz
 * **Next Steps** || **Key Driver(s)** || **By When** ||
 * Review the "Common Core Standards" to identify the "Power Standards" with both KKHS and Kalama Middle School Math Departments. Evaluate HSA, BMA, and Algebra II data to identify the common vocabulary that students need to reach proficiency in the Power Standards. || KKHS and Kalama Middle School Math Departments, Lori Fennell || Quarter 2 2010 ||
 * KKHS and Kalama Middle School Math departments, Edison Representative, and DOE Math Administrators will meet together to review available math programs and create a list of at least three programs that could replace the existing one. || Math Department, Edison Representative, DOE state administrators || December 2010 ||
 * Edison Representative and state DOE math administrators will attend at least one department meeting to observe and contribute to discussion about which choice of math program could be best implemented with fidelity at Middle and High School Levels. || KKHS and KMS Math Departments || Quarter 3 2011 ||
 * **Next Steps** || **Key Driver(s)** || **By When** ||
 * SSC will present Tiered Intervention System to School Leadership Committee with the intent of eliciting ideas for optimizing the overall effectiveness of the TIS. || Janina Kennedy, Leadership Team || Quarter 2 2010 ||
 * SSC, Administration, and Leadership Committee will create a new TIS including the ideas from the prior Leadership Committee Meeting. || Janina Kennedy, Leadership Team, Administration || December 2010 ||
 * Staff training on and implementation of newly revised Tiered Intervention System. || Administration || Quarter 3 2011 ||
 * **Next Steps** || **Key Driver(s)** || **By When** ||
 * Departments review teacher-generated data on fairness and effectiveness of current grading systems . Department Chairs gather and compile data for presentation in Leadership Meeting. || Department Chairs || January 2011 ||
 * Department Chairs share results of data review in Leadership Team meeting. Members determine which examples are most representative of fair and effective grading systems. || Leadership Commitee || Quarter 3 2011 ||
 * Staff will be presented with the systems to determine feasibility of cross-curricular application. || Full Staff || Quarter 4 2011 ||
 * **Next Steps** || **Key Driver(s)** || **By When** ||
 * Administration, Counseling, and Registrar evaluate class schedules from other schools/organizations and determine 3 that could possibly be used. || Scofield, Counselors, Kim Uyehara || Quarter 2 2010 ||
 * Staff and Administration use professional development time to review the selected schedules, and select one to focus on and/or modify for local use. || Full Staff and Administration || Quarter 3 2011 ||
 * Staff vote to approve or reject the newly created plan. || Full Staff || Quarter 4 2011 ||

=Other Notes or comments:=
 * Need for a person to compile and analyze data for mathematics program reviews.
 * Susan will find the appropriate human resources and/or monies to pay for collaboration time, review copies, student consumable guides, etc.